
Today I had a conversation that went badly wrong. I said something that landed as a personal attack. It was not intended as one. What I actually felt, what I was actually reacting to, lived in a register the other person had no access to. I was transmitting on a frequency he weren’t tuned to. And I didn’t realize it until the damage was done.
This happens in fencing constantly.
There is a moment every fencing coach knows. A referee makes a call. A parent says something in the hallway. A federation official explains a decision. And something ignites in you that seems wildly disproportionate to what just happened.
A coach tells a fencer “you’re dropping your arm on the attack,” but the fencer hears “you always do this, you never learn.” A parent asks “how did the tournament go?” but the fencer hears “did you win, because that’s all that matters.” A referee explains a call with textbook correctness, but the fencer hears the echo of every questionable call in every important bout they’ve ever lost.
The words transmitted were neutral. What arrived was radioactive.
This is not a communication failure in the ordinary sense. It’s a frequency gap. Each of us carries an interior archive, built from experience, disappointment, pattern recognition, and emotional memory. When something in the present moment rhymes with something in that archive, we don’t just respond to what’s in front of us. We respond to the whole accumulated mass.
The fencer who explodes at a referee isn’t just reacting to this touch. The coach who snaps at a parent isn’t just reacting to this question. The parent who says the wrong thing in the parking lot after a loss isn’t always saying what their child hears.
We are almost never just in this moment. We are in this moment plus everything it reminds us of.
The problem is that the other person only has access to this moment.
So what do we do with this?
First, we have to earn the right to our own frequency. If you carry something heavy, something accumulated and real, it deserves acknowledgment. Your pattern recognition is probably correct. Your frustration is probably legitimate. But the other person in front of you is not necessarily the right vessel for all of it, and this moment is not necessarily the right moment.
Second, we have to extend the same generosity to others. When someone reacts to you in a way that seems disproportionate, consider that you may have accidentally rhymed with something you know nothing about. You weren’t the cause. You were the trigger. Those are very different things, and only one of them is your responsibility.
Third, and this is the hard one: sometimes you will fail at both. You will transmit on the wrong frequency at the wrong moment to the wrong person. When that happens, the only thing left is to close the gap as honestly as you can. Not to explain yourself into absolution. Just to say: I was carrying something you couldn’t see, it came out wrong, and I’m sorry. That’s the closest thing to repair that language allows.
That’s what I did and I can only hope this time the frequency matched.
We are all broadcasting and receiving simultaneously, all the time, on frequencies shaped by everything that ever happened to us. The miracle isn’t that we misunderstand each other. The miracle is how often, against all odds, we actually connect.
Image: The Public Domain Vectors



0 Comments